Simply Everything

By Peter K. Lam

Chris Evans as Captain America?

The Hollywood Reporter has exclusive news that Chris Evans has been offered the role of Steve Rogers/Captain America in the upcoming Marvel Entertainment movie, “Captain America.” Chris Evans is no stranger to movies based on comic books and graphic novels. He was in the first two Fantastic Four movies, and will be starring in DC’s “The Losers” which will be in theaters Spring 2010. The problem right now is that Chris Evans is schedule to film called “What’s Your Number?” this summer but if he accepts the starring role for “Captain America,” he will also have to start shooting for that this summer as well. Both sides have yet to comment on the latest developments.

I think that Chris Evans would be great as Captain America. He definitely has the look for the role. Captain America is supposed to be an all-American looking guy who most people can relate to. He’s kind of your average guy with a superheroic side. Chris Evans definitely has that all-American wholesome goodness. He looks like a typical guy from the midwest which is probably the look Marvel was going after.

I believe that the story for the movie will follow the origins of Captain America from when he was scrawny Steve Rogers into brawny super soldier, Captain America. If Chris Evans accepts this role, he will be starring in at least three “Captain America” movies, the “Avengers” and probably a few other Marvel movies. Chris Evans will work perfectly into the crossover movies. His appearance kind of fits well with the rest of the cast that’s building for the “Avengers.”

So at this point there has been no response on if he’ll accept the offer but I really hope he does. The other choices for the role (ie John Krasinski, Michael Vogel, Channing Tatum, et al.) might not fit well with the rest of the cast that Marvel is trying to assemble. Michael Vogel would be my next choice should Chris Evans opts out. Now it’s time to wait and see…

Alice in Wonderland

By Peter K. Lam

I went to watch “Alice in Wonderland” in IMAX 3-D today and it was ok. There was a lot of hype about how magnificent it was going to be but honestly it did not really live up to the hype. The story was not as layered as I thought it’d be and it seemed to be gear more toward children. The 3-D graphics was not really utilized either. It seemed to be used to add addition dimensions to the characters and scenery. There were no scenes where stuff was flying out at the viewers. The 3-D was really not necessary. It could be also that the film was not made specifically to be in 3-D. I didn’t watch “Avatar” in 3-D so I don’t really have a comparison of how “Alice in Wonderland” fared with “Avatar.”

The story was pretty basic as well although there were a few confusing parts. It’s not made clear from the beginning that this live action version is actually a sequel to the animated film. I went in thinking that this was a re-imaging. The audience finds out later that the movie takes place after animated version. It would’ve been a better movie if it had more symbolism and adult-like themes.

On a side note, 3-D is just a passing fad. The technology is still not efficient enough to go mainstream. It might never get to that point. Some movies are able to pull off 3-D while others cannot. Some just don’t make sense to be in 3-D. It doesn’t add that much to the movie-going experience. Since “Avatar” made 3-D a recent hot topic, it may stay in the public eye for a while but I predict that the hype will die down in the coming years.

By Peter K. Lam

Don't they look similar?

I finally got around to watching “Avatar” yesterday after it’s been out for several weeks. I didn’t really intend on watching it but after all the hype from friends and others who watched it, I felt that I should give it a try and watch it. I actually tried to watch “Avatar” some time in January but the theater I went to had water damage to the projectors  from the heavy rains we had. I wasn’t able to watch that day so I watched “Daybreakers” instead which was also an entertaining two hours. I went in to watch “Avatar” with no reservations about the movie at all. I didn’t read in depth reviews or followed up on the backstory. All I knew is that a lot of people went to watch it and it was breaking records left and right.

The concept of this movie is that humans from Earth landed on a planet called Pandora with the sole purpose of raping the planet of its natural resources. Unfortunately the humans are not  the only intelligent life on the planet. The indigenous natives, called the Na’vi, are very protective of the land and happen to live right on top of the largest quantity of the natural resources the humans are after. The humans developed avatar technology which basically allows humans to connect to a body created of human/Na’vi DNA. The intent was to use the avatar bodies to communicate and hopefully assimilate into the Na’vi society to help find a diplomatic way of moving the Na’vi to another location rather than starting an all out war.

The visual effects of the movie was pretty incredible. The avatars are CG but were modeled after the actors and used motion capture technology to create some of the action scenes. The CG was so very detailed that some of it looked pretty real. I watched this in 2D as well so I can only imagine how more incredible it looked in 3D. The world of Pandora is rich with color and life that you probably would’ve been full immersed in if you watch it in 3D.\

The story itself was slightly altered from the age old tale of humans using up natural resources with no regard to the harm they were doing to the ecosystem around them. Even so, this new take on that story was gripping enough to carry viewers all the way through.

One complaint I have about the movie is about the colonel character. He was ridiculously macho and was the most annoying of all the characters. Arrogant, barbaric, and inhuman, he was just hard to identify with. He wanted to destroy the Na’vi and did not care that he would annihilate them just as long as he gets the natural resources he’s after. The most ridiculous thing about this character is that he’s so “tough” that he seemed practically impervious to harm. His arm was on fire at one point which he had practically no reaction to. He also attempted to stop the escape of the rebel forces by bursting out into the hostile atmosphere without any oxygen. He held his breath for probably 5 minutes or so and used several kinds of weapons while pursuing the rebels which is not humanly possible. He was a highly exaggerated stock character of a typical soldier as seen in other films. In this case he seemed to be a direct copy of another soldier in the animated film called “Small Soliders.” Look at the picture and you’ll see the resemblance.

Other than that hiccup in the movie, “Avatar” was thoroughly enjoyable and promises to entertain. I watched the 2D version which was cool. I’m sure 3D would be just as good. It’s probably better for those who want to feel “apart” of Pandora.